[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate

To: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 08:44:33 -0700
Cc: wg-b@dnso.org
References: <3.0.32.19991014091318.007610b0@pop.enteract.com><3806526D.173059CB@icbtollfree.com><E11bsyP-0007gA-00@rip.psg.com><4.2.0.58.19991015085821.01eacd30@dokka.maxware.no><E11c8pj-000IFq-00@rip.psg.com><38074B6D.B8CA777E@syr.edu>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

> Randy has confused registries and registrars.

no

> DARPA and NSF did not accredit registrars. IANA accredited registrars only
> within dot US.

you seem to not know about ten years of history.  no surprise.  what is
surprising is that you keep advertising it.

randy

References:
- RE: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
  - From: eileen kent <eileenk@enteract.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
  - From: Judith Oppenheimer <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>
- Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
Next by thread: [wg-b] Who accredited what (historical note)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread