[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [registrars] Revised WG-B Proposal

To: "Registrars@Dnso.Org" <registrars@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [registrars] Revised WG-B Proposal
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:47:36 +0900
In-Reply-To: <006e01bf97ae$08ccb3c0$45fda8c0@MIKE.infonetworks.com>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

At 00:33 27-03-2000 -0500, Michael D. Palage wrote:

Attached please find the latest draft of the Registrar WG-B Proposal. Marked
up language appears in bold and I have provided comments for each amendment.

Dear Michael: I didn't think we were going to say this in so many words.

"their domain name(s) at a discounted basis".

I'm sure some registrars will give them a good discount, but I think you either need to weasel word it or be explicit.

I have not read the whole document yet, perhaps you did;-)

Regards, BobC

References:
- [registrars] Revised WG-B Proposal
  - From: "Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@infonetworks.com>

Prev by Date: [registrars] Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:20:31 +1000
Next by Date: Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
Prev by thread: RE: [registrars] Revised WG-B Proposal
Next by thread: [registrars] [Fwd: Code of Conduct task force proposal]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread