RE: [registrars] Revised WG-B Proposal

[Josh Elliott <jelliott@tucows.com>]

Nice job, Michael.

Josh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 9:34 PM
> To: Registrars@Dnso.Org
> Subject: [registrars] Revised WG-B Proposal
> 
> 
> Attached please find the latest draft of the Registrar WG-B 
> Proposal. Marked
> up language appears in bold and I have provided comments for each 
> amendment.
> The purpose of this revised draft is to appeal to the respective
> Intellectual Property and Non-Commercial Constituencies. Our goal is the
> controlled responsible growth of the domain name space absent 
> filters. Some
> would argue that some of this new language is not materially 
> relevant to our
> position. They would be right. However, in the politics of ICANN were you
> need 10 votes for a majority on the Names Counsel sometimes you 
> have to go a
> little extra to gain some votes.
> 
> I welcome the groups comments on this revised proposal. My main 
> concern are
> any potential NON-STARTERS.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Mike
> 
> P.S. The Code of Code is now being moved to my front burner :)
> 
> 
> 
>