RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

Bob,

I am the one who proposed the amendment. Elana is not trying to sneak
anything in. She has done an excellent job of trying to be fair to all
concerns and in trying to keep the process on track.

Elana, I apologize that my proposed amendment has resulted in some attacks
on your motives. That certainly was not my intention. I can also see that
my proposed amendment does not have any hope of being accepted and may
cause further delay in keeping this process moving forward. As a result I
withdraw it.

Tim


 -------- Original Message --------
   Subject: RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
   From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
   Date: Sat, April 26, 2003 12:11 am
   To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@dnso.org>

   At 04:45 PM 4/25/03 -0500, Tim Ruiz wrote:
   >And I'm not going to digress into name calling with you. If there are
   >registrars involved in questionable practices they should certainly
   >be looked into.

   Tim:  Not the point.  From the beginning the RC has made it clear that
   when  Verisign swallows up a member that it does not acquire
   additional voting  rights.  If Elana is trying to slip this change
   under the door or over the  transom, it will be dead on arrival.
   Regards, BobC