DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar

To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:20:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030426000432.03500b80@207.228.254.7>
References: <21448230.1051296201@[192.168.1.155]><008e01c30b63$99a04070$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ><008e01c30b63$99a04070$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

At 12:08 AM 4/26/03 +0100, Paul Westley wrote:
>This idea is definitely a very slippery slope. Why not just give Network 
>Solutions a veto on anything the constituency might like to do?

Dear Paul:  Again you make it quite clear:-)  Why not? Why would we ever do 
it?;-(  Regards, BobC

References:
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: Paul Westley <paul@internetters.co.uk>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>