ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Washington & PersonalNames Update


Ditto and to all the meetings Mike has organized for us in the past. It is
almost a thankless job and we, from time to time, take it for granted
assuming room and chairs will be there when we arrive.

Joyce



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>; <ross@tucows.com>;
<registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] Washington & PersonalNames Update


> Hello Mike,
>
> Just a note to publicly thank you for doing the organising for the
registrars meeting.
> Other groups use paid staff for this (e.g IETF), and we should all
acknowledge the large amount of voluntary time you put into the
constituency.
>
> In future the constituency might consider a small charge for attending
such meetings that could be used to engage a person to do all the leg work.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:michael@palage.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:27 AM
> > To: ross@tucows.com; registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] Washington & PersonalNames Update
> >
> >
> > Ross,
> >
> > As the only person planning the meeting while simultaneously preparing
> > several of the power point presentations and scheduling guest speakers
> > things are a little busy. Additionally, because it looks like
> > Dan will be
> > unable to physically attend the meeting I spent the last hour
> > trying to
> > arrange for a telephone bridge into the room. In addition to
> > my "day job"
> > things have been a little hectic :-)
> >
> > I will be publishing a list hopefully by the end of the day, as I am
> > compiling a head count to give to the hotel so they will all
> > be able to be
> > feed everyone. Right now I believe there will be approximately 20-30
> > registrar representatives and 10-15 registry representatives.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > P.S. Quid pro quo, I will get you this list if you could
> > answers the list of
> > questions that I asked you earlier in the week.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:53 AM
> > > To: 'Michael D. Palage'; registrars@dnso.org
> > > Subject: RE: [registrars] Washington & PersonalNames Update
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am currently looking at about 20 registrar attending the
> > > > meeting, and about 6 registries, although other have been
> > > > expressing an interest in attending. I will be putting
> > > > together a formal list of attendees shortly.
> > >
> > > Michael - is it still your intent to publish this list? It would be
> > > helpful for Tucows planning purposes.
> > >
> >
> >
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>