DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] [Policy-forum] FW: WHOIS POLICY VOTE (fwd)

The policy seems silent on how much the registry will be paying us to verify
their data for them. Any ideas?


"...the current generation of users and system designers has grown up
hobbled by implicit assumptions that frustrate simplicity. The real essence
of the Internet is simplicity. We must be aware of the implicit assumptions
that are subverting this simplicity so we can start removing the perverse
interactions." - Bob Frankston

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
To: "Registrars List" <Registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: [registrars] [Policy-forum] FW: WHOIS POLICY VOTE (fwd)

> -rick
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:33:48 -0500
> From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
> To: "'policy-forum@lists.neustar.biz'" <policy-forum@lists.neustar.biz>
> Subject: [Policy-forum] FW: WHOIS POLICY VOTE
> All,
> The following motion passed by a vote of 6-0-0, with two members  of the
> Policy Council (Ms. Tennant and Mr. Love) not participating in the vote.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> US Policy Council, Secretariat
> Proposed Resolution US-0003:
> Whereas, the .US Policy Council seeks to address the issue of accurate
> data;
> Whereas the .US Policy Council has developed an initial policy entitled
> Importance of Accurate Whois Data in the .US Top-level Domain" which can
> found [below];
> Resolved that in accordance with the .US Policy Council Charter, which can
> be found  [below], the .US Policy Council requests comments from the usTLD
> Administrator, NeuStar, Inc. on this proposed initial policy by  February
> 14, 2003.
> The Importance of Accurate Whois Data in the .US Top-Level Domain
> (Michael Palage)
> The accuracy and access of Whois information is a topic of global
> and importance. Although there are currently underway various initiatives
> both the public and private sectors to address these problems, the
> of Whois information within the .US top-level domain is of critical
> importance with the potential launch of a .KIDS.US space. Although the
> specifics of this proposed "green space" have not been finalized, it is
> without question that the accuracy of data associated with any domain
> registered in this space is of paramount concern.
> The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) recently
> launched an initiative to assist third parties and registrars in
> and correcting inaccurate Whois information. Information about this
> can be found online at http://www.internic.net/cgi/rpt_whois/rpt.cgi
> <http://www.internic.net/cgi/rpt_whois/rpt.cgi> . This program appears to
> have been positively received in the community, as ICANN to date has
> received over 2,800 submissions. As with all initiatives, the first 2,800
> submissions has identified certain issues that need to be addressed to
> ensure that appropriate safeguard mechanisms are in place that take into
> account the business realties of the marketplace to prevent against
> unintended deletions of domain names.
> Listed below are the proposed modifications that should be incorporated
> a formal Whois accuracy policy:
>         NeuStar will operate a web-based reporting mechanism ("Whois
> Accuracy Portal") by which parties can submit inquiries regarding the
> accuracy of Whois data;
>         NeuStar will employ appropriate automated mechanisms to prevent
> inappropriate submissions to the Whois Accuracy Portal, however, there
> be no requirement imposed on NeuStar to manually review these submissions
> prior to forwarding them to the registrar of record for investigation;
>         NeuStar will approve a standardized Whois Accuracy Inquiry Notice
> (WAIN) prepared by accredited registrars in consultation with domain name
> stakeholders regarding inquires about false or inaccurate Whois data;
>         NeuStar shall require that registrars send the standardized WAIN
> their domain name registrant after receiving a notification of potentially
> false or inaccurate Whois data via the Whois Accuracy Portal;
>         Registrar or Registrant shall be required to respond to inquiries
> regarding the accuracy of the Whois data within 30 days (note: this is an
> increase from the current 15 day time period);
>         Registrars shall be required to comply with reporting mechanisms
> incorporated into the Whois Accuracy Portal to allow NeuStar to monitor
> registrar compliance;
>         Registrar specific information collected from this reporting
> mechanism shall not be made public, however, NeuStar may provide summary
> details regarding the success of the Whois Accuracy Portal.
>         Registrars that are unable to verify the accuracy of the Whois
> or fail to receive instructions from the registrant within thirty (30)
> shall delete the name at the end of the thirty-day period.  The Registry
> will place the name in a redemption grace period during which the
> may only re-activate the domain name upon verification of the accuracy of
> its Whois data.  At the end of the Redemption Grace Period the domain name
> shall be made available to the general public if it has not been
> reactivated;
>         Registrar shall not remove the domain name from hold status or
> renew the domain name until registrant has provided documented proof which
> the registrar shall be required to retain;
>         In the situation where the registrar receives a second inquiry
> regarding the accuracy of Whois data for a specific domain name, the
> Registrar shall require documented proof from the domain name registrant
> within the 30 day time frame or have the domain name placed on hold in
> accordance with the process described above;
>         NeuStar shall incorporate into the Whois Accuracy Portal a
> contractual requirement that third parties submitting Whois accuracy
> inquiries acknowledge that the submission is not intended to interfere
> the lawful operations of the domain name registrant or registrar; and
>         The Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) and the Registry
> Registrar Agreement (RRA) should be appropriately amended to incorporate
> following requirements.
> Nothing in this policy shall prevent a registrar from taking action (i.e.
> deleting a domain name) in less than 30 days in appropriate circumstances,
> including but not limited to fraudulently submitted Whois data.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>