DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-whois] Revised Bulk Access Draft

On 2002-11-25 22:53:06 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> Please find attached some changes for 8 (a) and 8 (b).

Warning: It seems like my word processor has mixed up the relevant
change tracking.  The text should read like this:

>8 (a) When registrations are deleted on the basis of submission of
>false contact data or non-response to registrar inquiries, the
>redemption grace period -- once implemented -- should be applied.
>However, the redeemed domain name should not be included in the zone
>file until accurate and verified contact information is available.
>The details of this procedure are under investigation in the Names
>Council's deletes task force.
>(b) Responses to the interim report indicate interest in placing
>registrations for which accurate or updated contact data has not
>been received in an appropriate hold status for some period of time
>prior to the eventual deletion of the registrations.  Registrations
>in this hold status would be returned to operational status upon
>provision of accurate and verified contact information.  Further
>research by this Task Force or an other appropriate body, in
>consultation with registrars and other interested parties, is needed
>to determine whether the benefits of adding this additional step
>outweigh the potential costs.

Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>