ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-whois] [fwd] [Fwd: RAA question - WHOIS] (from: touton@icann.org)


Forwarded with permission.
-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>



----- Forwarded message from Louis Touton <touton@icann.org> -----

From: Louis Touton <touton@icann.org>
To: roessler@does-not-exist.org
Cc: halloran@icann.org
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:25:33 -0800
Subject: [Fwd: RAA question - WHOIS]
Envelope-to: roessler@does-not-exist.info
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 04:29:29 +0100
X-No-Spam: whitelist

Thomas,

Section 3.3.6 of the RAA requires that registrars make Whois data
available for bulk access on the stated terms and conditions.  It does
not prohibit registrars from making Whois data, or any other data they
possess, available on other terms and conditions that they may
determine.

Section 3.7.7.8 merely states that the registrar will agree in its
registration agreement that the registrar will take reasonable steps to
enforce whatever limitations on authorized access it has established.
It does not prohibit the registrar from giving authority for others to
receive access to Personal Data. If a registrar chooses to make bulk
Whois data available *only* under the terms and conditions of section
3.3.6, then under section 3.7.7.8 the registrar must take reasonable
precautions to see that those conditions are observed.  Otherwise, the
registrar can authorize access on a different basis, and implementing
those other access arrangements would not violate section 3.7.7.8.

Section 3.7.7.7 may also be relevant.

Best regards,

Louis Touton

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RAA question - WHOIS
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:46:04 +0100
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: Dan Halloran <halloran@icann.org>, Louis Touton <touton@icann.org>

Dan, Louis,

I've got a specific question on the RAA.  Assume that bulk access
eligibility (3.6.6.1) [sic, 3.3.6.1] is reduced to a limited number of
purposes, or that a certain purpose is determined to be "ineligible"
(that's where the task force is currently heading).

Would, in that case, 3.7.7.8 prevent the registrar from voluntarily
making bulk WHOIS data available for the ineligible purpose?

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>




----- End forwarded message -----


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>