ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] cleaned up chapter II


Thank you,

You have excellent timing. I am now adding the final edits into the master 
document and am at part I.D., II is next, of course, :)

I am not aware of any further advancements to the recommendations document 
than what we've seen here already.  I understand it will be incorporated it 
into the power point presentation.

~k

At 03:01 PM 6/21/2002 -0400, Steve Metalitz wrote:
>Kristy et al,
>
>In the attached I have cleaned up the text of chapter II (as posted in the
>6/19 version) by (1) eliminating the struck through text, (2)  eliminating
>the italicized text left over from Ghana, which we had agreed to eliminate
>throughout, (3) accepting Thomas' reformulation (circulated 6/13/02) of the
>discussion of question 9 results.
>
>I wonder what is the status of the redrafted recommendations section which
>Thomas circulated a couple of days ago and which Hakikur subsequently
>supported.  I hope we can agree to insert this in the master text.
>
>Steve Metalitz
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: k@widgital.com [mailto:k@widgital.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AM
>To: nc-whois@dnso.org
>Subject: [nc-whois] section VI
>
>
>All,
>
>For your reference, this is the current version of the update for section
>VI.  If you have comments, please ...  as soon as possible.
>
>*remember* we are all using responses from Q20 to further evaluate our
>assigned sections.  This is no longer the only section where Q20 is covered.
>
>Thanks!
>
>:)
>
>~k
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>