Re: [nc-udrp] question

[Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca>]

That makes it more difficult to translate, of course since we don't have a
compact definition of cybersquatting available.

"Chicoine, Caroline G." wrote:

> I would prefer to leave it as is, since in the earlier sections we were
> talking specifically about UDRP and thus want to track its language, but in
> question 54, we are dealing generally with cybersquatting which could
> conceivably cover more than simply "abusive domain name registrations"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Steinberg [mailto:synthesis@videotron.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:06 PM
> To: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'
> Subject: [nc-udrp] question
>
> As I was translating the questionnaire, I came upon the word
> "cybesquatting" in question 54. Its use was eliminated elsewhere in the
> questionnaire in favor of  the UDRP term. How should I handle this
> apparent inconsistency in the translation of question 54 (and no it does
> not mean that I am almost finished....)
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca