Re: [nc-org] The TF roster
I'm sorry if I was unclear. Roger was not invited to be a full
participant of the task force and should be removed from the
list. He will be asked to respond to specific issues uncovered
by the TF as we move along. It is inappropriate to have more
than one member from each constituency on the TF, as
Philip made clear to us.
>>> Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr> 08/16/01 01:51PM >>>
You are correct that Roger Cochetti was invited to join this
group for his expertise. Just added:
"Roger Cochetti" <firstname.lastname@example.org> has been added to nc-org.
If there are other people missing on the list, please let me know.
So far we have:
NCDNH: Milton Mueller
IPC: Guillermo Carey
ccTLD: Elisabeth Porteneuve
BC: Grant Forsyth
gTLD: Cary Karp
Registrars: Ken Stubbs
gTLD: Roger Cochetti
> From email@example.com Sat Aug 4 09:18 MET 2001
> Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:14:39 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
> From: Cary Karp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Subject: [nc-org] The TF roster
> Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.firstname.lastname@example.org>
> X-X-Sender: email@example.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> It strikes me that the list of recipients of communications
> addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org doesn't precisely correspond to the
> list of TF reps that have been appointed by their constituencies.
> This is fine by me, as I agree that the value of our work will be
> enhanced by encouraging the input of selected individuals on the
> basis of their ability to contribute to the discussion.
> I note that Milton previously stated his intention to invite Roger
> Cochetti to participate in TF activity, given Roger's expert
> understanding of matters relating to .org.
> Has this invitation been extended?
> Have the constituencies that, at last notice, had yet to appoint
> their TF reps now been heard from?