ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions


Srikanth and all former DNSO GA members,

  I must entirely agree with you here Srikanth.  There are no good or
really implamentable solutions that would not impede good works
practice or otherwise compromise a registrants safety and privacy.
However as you likely know, the IPC and BC of ICANN and
other intellectual property folks are not that concerned or interested
in personal safety of others or registrants privacy...  They strongly
believe that their collective rights or desires supersede those
of registrants, the general public, or any individual on the face of the
planet, pretty much...

Srikanth Narra wrote:

> Deleting a domain because of inaccurate WHOIS record is not right. Someone
> paid for it. If the registrar didn't have problem accepting the money - they
> or someone else should not invent causes to delete it.
>
> I can not comprehend and am yet to hear a single legitimate reason or
> benefit that comes from a domain being deleted because of an inaccurate
> WHOIS record. If its current policy then its wrong policy and should be
> changed.
>
> Even in (extreme) cases like say spamming or malicious virus attacks, etc.
> from a domain with inaccurate WHOIS record. I don't see any reason for the
> domain to be deleted. The domain marked be marked and left disabled.
>
> Adding and displaying a few fields
>
> a. Status - [Disabled]
> b. Reason - [Spam /Court order?]
> c. Whom to contact to Enable - [Registrar contact info]
>
> along with/to WHOIS record should take care of providing concrete notice and
> issues arising from trying to reach the registrant with no irreversible harm
> done.
>
> If the entity behind the domain is genuine - they will contact sooner or
> later. Else the domain allowed to die its natural death in continued Disable
> stage AFTER its time runs out. A check can be enforced at the time of
> renewal for the MARKED domains to ensure the WHOIS record is right.
>
> Between this and existing established law, procedure and channels to take
> things to next step - I can not think of any issues that can not be handled.
>
> An organization, society or a civilization is only
>
> as robust as rights that exist within it for all parties and
> as honorable as the fairness, the extent and the manner in which such rights
> are enforced.
>
> I am hoping there is still some sense of honor and some resemblance of
> fairplay left.
>
> Sri
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>