ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Official Altroot bashing (Re: [ga] ICANN Whois Update)


The irritation is universal.
Inclusives and ccTLD bashing is becoming a common occurence.
Slights and innuendos are not acceptable.
Shame on you if you fool me once, but shame on me each time thereafter.
e

> On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, at 13:47 [=GMT-0400], Michael D. Palage wrote:
> 
>> Very interesting update from ICANN on Whois accuracy.
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-03sep02.htm
> 
> Indeed. Thanks. I fail to see, why it is necessary to have on the
> www.internic.net website (where one can complain about inaccurate whois
> data online) a "Non-technical explanation of the domain-name system why
> universal resolvability is important", mainly an attempt at altroot
> bashing. This gives me the idea that the whois correctness exercize is
> also mainly prompted by ICANN's felt need for selfjustification, to
> which www.internic.net seems now dedicated.
> 
> Bah.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>