ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Vint why do none of the NIC's have any way to inform them of WHOIS data that is wrong...


Damn,
How can the staff be so intrusive and yet incompetent at the same time?

I tell you after suffering through about 600 pages of VB.net re.NETv1.0
and reviewing Flemmings' matters and the real dotBIZ, it is conclusive 
the BoD as a body are complete boobs.  They are becoming and will soon be 
completely irrelevant. 
I hope Lacnic and Afnic are keeping their options open.  EU be careful.

Eric
> 
> Todd,
> 
> You are barking up the wrong tree.
> 
> ICANN doesn't even maintain proper whois data for an entire TLD - .cx.
> 
> The whois data for the .cx TLD lists a company which has been defunct
> for three years.
> 
> And you think they are going to fix second-level domain registrations?
> 
> Dream on.
> 
> John
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of todd
>> glassey
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:24 AM
>> To: vint cerf
>> Cc: ga@dnso.org
>> Subject: [ga] Vint why do none of the NIC's have any way to inform
>> them of WHOIS data that is wrong...
>>
>>
>> Vint - the operating process of the NIC's seem to have no way for
>> individuals to report domains that are either misregistered or have
>> fraudulent contact information or broken links for whatever reason.
>>
>> This is a real problem since these are the issues that spammers and
>> other peddlers of illicit materials create for themselves to hide
>> behind. For instance - I get this SPAM this morning showing half a
>> dozen school girls involved in various sexual acts and after doing a
>> header analysis, we find it comes from a domain called 99talk.com,
>> registered through the Boy Scouts
>> of Australia, only the contact email addresses for the domain all
>> bounce...
>>
>> And in instances like this one,  if the NIC bothered to check its
>> contact data on a regular basis of course this would not be true. So I
>> have to ask -
>> Why then do the InterNIC's not have any way of taking reports or doing
>> anything about these fraudulent or inaccurate listings in the
>> Whois or other
>> "client databases" maintained buy the NIC's?
>>
>> This is negligence in the Registrar and ICANN process, not an excuse
>> for plausible deniability and it needs to be addressed.
>>
>> Todd
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>