Re: [ga] Re: ICANN & transfers

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Vinton,

Thank you for contributing your thoughts.

Eric

"vinton g. cerf" wrote:

> At 05:31 PM 7/31/2002 +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >At 09:37 p.m. 30/07/2002 -0400, vinton g. cerf wrote:
> >
> >>the information I have seems to show that these specifics are in the
> >>contract between registrars and registry at least for the particular
> >>case of .com/.net/.org so ICANN does not have 3rd party standing to
> >>intervene for that case. The newer gTLD contracts are a bit more
> >>refined.
> >
> >The newer gTLD contracts do they include the ccTLD's that Verisign has bought? (.tv  .bz e.a.)
> ><snip>
>
> no I don't think so becaue VeriSign is not under contract to ICANN to operate these -
> it is under contract to whoever is responsible for those ccTLDs.
>
> >>It looks so me as if we need something more refined than dis-
> >>accreditation as the principal tool providing incentive to adhere
> >>to contract terms.
> >
> >fines?
> >
> >And to whom will the cost of both the policing and the compliance be passed on?
>
> that's one of the reasons there probably are no more refined mechanisms
>
> >--Joop
>
> Vint Cerf
> SVP Architecture & Technology
> WorldCom
> 22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
> Ashburn, VA 20147
> 703 886 1690 (v806 1690)
> 703 886 0047 fax
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html