RE: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest
> > > Joanna Lane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It is my suggestion to agree one ground rule. While the DNSO
> > > > continues to operate as currently structured, no officers
> of the DNSO
> > shall
> > > > be eligible to stand for office in the At Large.
> > >
> > > I would go a bit further and stipulate that "no present or
> > > past officers, or committee appointees, of the DNSO or
> > > ICANN shall be eligible to stand for office in the At
> > > Large." If what is sought is bottom-up legitimacy, then
> > > the top is not where we start looking for officials of the
> > > AtLarge IMHO.
Section 4. ELIGIBILITY
No person shall serve simultaneously as (i) a member of any Supporting
Organization Council or other body that is directly responsible for the
selection of Directors by that Supporting Organization and (ii) a Director
or a member of any other Supporting Organization Council. If a member of any
such Supporting Organization Council or such other body accepts a nomination
to be considered to serve on the Board, such member shall not, following
such acceptance, participate in any discussion of, or vote by, such
Supporting Organization Council or other body relating to the selection of
Directors by such Council or other body.
No person shall serve simultaneously
You can't be on the Names Council
> It would be a good idea to take this discussion off the GA list
> and move it
> where it belongs. http://www.icannatlarge.com/forum/ under the thread
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html