ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest


At 23:03 28/02/02 +0100, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>On 28 Feb 2002, at 15:49, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
>Icannatlarge is about self organization and support for the At Large 
>membership. As
>things stand, we can be happy about everyone who signs up. The more 
>people, the better.
>
>Also, I would like to leave it to the voters' discretion to decide  who 
>they would want
>to see in office.
>
>jeanette
> > Joanna Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > It is my suggestion to agree one ground rule. While the DNSO
> > > continues to operate as currently structured, no officers of the DNSO 
> shall
> > > be eligible to stand for office in the At Large.
> >
> > I would go a bit further and stipulate that "no present or
> > past officers, or committee appointees, of the DNSO or
> > ICANN shall be eligible to stand for office in the At
> > Large."  If what is sought is bottom-up legitimacy, then
> > the top is not where we start looking for officials of the
> > AtLarge IMHO.

It would be a good idea to take this discussion off the GA list and move it 
where it belongs. http://www.icannatlarge.com/forum/  under the thread 
"Charter".



--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>