ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[7]: [ga] RE: [icann-delete] WLS Input - Greatest Good vs. Benefit s of the Few


Tuesday, Tuesday, January 15, 2002, 9:46:44 PM, Ron Wiener wrote:

> Walsh,

> The data is based on only active subscriptions in our system, not historical
> sales records.  You can't get fresher data than this.  If you refuse to read
> the material, I refuse to answer any more of your unproductive questions.  

Active subscriptions from January 2000.

2 years ago.

That's the freshest data you can provide?

That was even before the restrictions on domain deletions causes a
boon to your business model, and even before you had anywhere near as
many registrar contracts as you do now.

I have a hard time considering that data "fresh" and I also have a
hard time seeing your answers as anything resembling "productive."

What you refuse to answer is the charge, which appear to admit above,
that you are using out of date data to try and twist things around and
pretend your major source of revenue is not from domain speculators.

What I have to wonder, is why are you not providing more recent data?

I can speculate on that of course, and of course my speculation would
be that it would show that the assumptions being made about your
business model and its attractiveness have been correct.

Feel free to provide some more recent data to refute this.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--

"There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of
the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer
interprets the truth."
-- Jean Giradoux

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>