[ga] Future of sub-lists
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:40:02 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
> Wednesday, Wednesday, January 09, 2002, 9:25:17 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 21:03:43 +1300, David Farrar wrote:
> >> I note that there has not been a single post on any of the sub lists
> >> for around three months. Thus it is probably fair to conclude they
> >> are now redundant
> >> It is a pity because I actually thought they were potentially useful
> >> but for whatever reasons they haven't worked.
> > William X. Walsh killed off the idea with a barrage of criticism. This
> > part of the reason I resigned as Alt Chair.
> Ah, yes, passing responsibility for your failures now, Patrick?
LOL, William, you're a card.
> The fact is that you tried to MANDATE the use of those lists and
> forcibly move discussions from the GA list to these lists, and THAT is
> what killed your lists.
Sorry, William, most people on the list couldn't give a shit one way or the
other. All they wanted was an effective method of communication.
The truth is that if you weren't subscribed the sub-lists would have
succeeded. You really can take comfort in knowing that you torpedoed the
> People do not want to be subscribed to many
> lists, and people do not want to discussion issues with just a small
> subgroup of those involved.
Spin, William. They were small because they never had the chance to get off
> That is why your lists failed.
Everybody on the GA list knows you are a bully and a wrecker. Just look at
your latest effort. On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:42:28 -0800, William X. Walsh
> I assure you, Ron, you will know who I am before this up, as I have
> made killing this deal one of my primary goals right now.
Like you killed IDNO and the sublists ?
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html