Re: [ga] Internet stability

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

Happy holidays Dan...

It sounds to me like your advocating that ICANN should be responsible for
developing policies that deal with breakdowns of poorly operated business
like this.

it would seem to me that the "marketplace" would absorb failures here and
there are, in most cases, redundancies to services currently provided should
they fail.  my guess is that there are dsl and other alternative services in
most markets (although the backup in my market will be 56k dialup) and ,
though there will be inconveniences to consumers (just like airline
failures) there are options. people will learn from these experiences and
will elect to stay with more reliable providers in the future

the one issue that I do have is not an icann policy issue but rather a
"regulatory" licensing   issue and that is one of disclosure.  I live in a
smaller market where there are many thousands of cable internet subscribers
and, to-date,  Comcast has not disclosed directly to ANY of their
subscribers that their service may be in danger of failure. they have a very
"obscure" reference on their  homepage but I can assure you that virtually
none of their subscribers are even aware of the www.comcast.com url much
less the vague allusions located on the home page of the site under "answers
to questions regarding comcast@home service".

the people who grant exclusive licenses to these cable companies should
require disclosure whenever continuation of service is in jeopardy under
penalty of license forfeiture. (if the SEC can mandate "risk disclosure"
then so can the licensing agencies !!

i guess that one would have to decide whether cable internet access is an
"essential service " when thare are viable alternatives available   (i think
not !)

ken stubbs


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Steinberg" <synthesis@videotron.ca>
To: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
Cc: "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>; "General assembly list" <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Internet stability


> Respectfully, I disagree.
>
> ICANN and its predecessor were never related to the defoliation process.
Nor
> were they ever associated with agricultural controls (or lack thereof)
that led
> to the mad cow disease problem.
>
> However the 24.xxx.xxx.xxx IP address block allocation that made the @home
> business model possible in the first place, etc....
> started with IANA. This has everything to do with stability.  If not at
the
> operational level, at least at the policy level where ICANN claims
> jusrisdiction.
>
> You can pay risk mgmt consultants or other experts to tell you but it's
just
> common sense that the larger the single point of failure, the more you do
to
> provide either failure prevention or failover security.
>
> Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> > what a "stretch " here !!
> >
> > next thing I expect to hear is that ICANN is somehow responsible for the
> > past outbreaks of "Mad Cow" disease.
> >
> > when you get finish with this silly thread then you can next propose a
> > resolution blaming ICANN for the "defoliation" of the rain forests in
> > southeast Asia and south America
> >
> > ken stubbs
> > (who by the way is coming to you from comcast@home  in orlando florida)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
> > To: "GA DNSO (E-mail)" <ga@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:36 PM
> > Subject: [ga] Internet stability
> >
> > > As of midnight, tonight, 4 million users, just in the SF Bay Area, may
> > lose
> > > their internet connection due to the business failure of Excite @
home.
> > >
> > > Lately, we've been talking about what matters. Well, this is what
matters
> > to
> > > the Internet public. This has been seen coming for almost four months.
Has
> > > the ICANN even tried to do anything? Yet, ICANN claims to help
stabilize
> > the
> > > Internet. The territory that ICANN claims, doesn't touch any part of
this.
> > >
> > > This may be the largest outage in the history of the Internet.
Heretofore,
> > > the NorthPoint failure may have had claim to that honor. However,
unlike
> > > NorthPoint, Excite has mostly residential customers. Ergo, the impact
on
> > > business isn't as great. DSL providers can expect many new customers
as a
> > > result, even if Excite doesn't pull the plug tonight.
> > >
> > > --
> > > R O E L A N D  M J  M E Y E R
> > > Managing Director
> > > Morgan Hill Software Company
> > > tel: +1 925 373 3954
> > > cel: +1 925 352 3615
> > > fax: +1 925 373 9781
> > > http://www.mhsc.com
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
>
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html