Re: [ga] The BoD - Ratings and/or evaluations by stakeholders

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Jeff,

In answer to all of your questions and suggestions;

Thank you for your input and work.

Open - Meaning setting the method for rating as a 1 -10 and setting the basis as
something as simple as "based upon your perception of how they do their jobs, with 1
being the worst they could do and 10 being the best"

I really wanted to keep it more public perception oriented and not related to
historical precedence.

It would be great if other groups also ran the ratings but I can only participate as
a GA member.

The term "War Chest" as I meant it, is a political term.  The thought being that
after a few ratings people can go to it and use it as a pro and con for why they
should be on the board.

I like that "etched in Jell-O".  No I did not mean the rating mechanism should not
be solid and stable I simply mean at this time my position is very flexible
regarding this endeavor.  Keep in mind I generally have to always do that because I
require input from technical support to get it done.

Jeff please keep in mind.  If I were sitting on the board and there were prospects
of elections in which I could be dethroned and I really did not want the general
public to see I just rubber stamped things I would take a dim view of this rating
and probably try to politically crucify those responsible.  So let's go slow with
this and see if we can keep my head a little ways away from the guillotine, I would
appreciate it.

OTOH we should get the BoD input because I think they could find out some useful
things that would help them in their jobs.  Unlike you, I find they are a responsive
pleasant group that as a group has a diametrically opposed position from mine.  But
that's ok I have friends that are atheists. We should work together on this because
it can be a win win if done properly.

Again thanks for your efforts.
Eric

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html