Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net
Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:12:22PM -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> > In it, New.net does not argue for multiple roots systems,
> What they argue really isn't very important -- they are so full of hype
> you can't tell what they are talking about anyway. What matters is what
> they *do*, and they have *done* is create an alternate root.
Actually, it's more of an enhancement to the existing root... like an
amplification, if you will. The simple brute fact is that ICANN and the USG
had not foreseen the inventive approach employed by new.net to circumvent the
cartel-like conditions that were becoming increasingly evident through a
growing number of blatant abuses of a *non-existent power...
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html