Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:12:22PM -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> It's unfortunate that so few people have read New.net's position paper
> carefully, including it would appear ICANN staff and Stuart Lynn.
Gee, which should we believe -- the words in New.net's position paper,
or your words when you say that they have in fact created an alternate
> In it, New.net does not argue for multiple roots systems,
What they argue really isn't very important -- they are so full of hype
you can't tell what they are talking about anyway. What matters is what
they *do*, and they have *done* is create an alternate root.
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
firstname.lastname@example.org lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html