Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Member

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Eric,
the constituencies are part of the GA, but their Members may not read all 
the sub-lists and get bored by the noise on the GA. So better to reach them 
where they are... Would you call that "inreach"?
Jefsey

On 05:21 30/06/01, Eric Dierker said:
>Dear Peter,
>
>Am I missing something?  why possibly would the GA write to Constituencies
>to garner support or denial.  You are reccomending top down consensus.  The
>GA is supposed to tell the NC what to do not the other way around.  Let us
>try this real easy;  *bottoms up open and transparent stakeholder
>represenativiness*  Does any of that fit into what you just suggested? Now
>you may have been mistaken and not meant to have signed this as chair of the
>ccTLD but that is not our problem.
>
>I will take the rest in order as it represents our upward problem;
>
>Peter de Blanc wrote:
>
> > Danny-
> >
> > While I appreciate your agressiveness in mobilizing the GA, this latest
> > manoeuver is going too far.
> >
>
>In what capacity do you make such a claim?  It would appear you do anything
>but appreciate an aggressive GA.
>
> >
> > The job of the chair is to facilitate consensus building, and do
> > administrative tasks, and, yes, perhaps even to inspire and mobilize.
> >
>
>And where did you find those criterion?  The Job of our chair is to remain
>true to his own character in representing our fine Assembly, until we decide
>otherwise.
>
> >
> > The job IS NOT that of an executive, empowered by the GA to make
> > unilateral decisions.
> >
>
>Wrong in a big way!!  We elected him and he is ours and he may not go the
>way some of us want but until *we* decide otherwise he is doing a great job.
>
> >
> > I've supported your efforts so far, Danny, but not this.
> >
> > Facilitate consensus- and that means a MUCH broader sample of the GA
> > membership.
> >
>
>You have clearly not read much on consensus and perhaps I am too hard and I
>apologize and would like to help you learn what it means.  This reminds me
>of the ccTLD attack of you in Melbourne because it was perceived you acted
>against their interests in budget.
>
> >
> > For starters, write to a NC member of each constituency and get this
> > matter posted on the constituency lists.
> >
>
>For starters check in with the top in order to form our thoughts????  This
>must have been a private post accidentally posted publicly.
>
> >
> > Peter de Blanc
> > Chair, ccTLD
>
>Have you moved the channels you just suggested in making this statement as a
>chair or are you doing all the things perceived wrong by you?
>Major problem signing this as the ccTLD chair, Danny would never do such a
>thing!  Mr. Thrush would never have acted in such impulsive behavior.
>
>I am sorry if I have offended but dictating policy from one constituency to
>the GA is detrimental to progress.
>
>Sincerely,
>Eric
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html