Re: [ga] Joop Teemstra's candidacy
On 16:17 09/06/01, William X. Walsh said:
>Saturday, June 09, 2001, 5:44:38 AM, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> > This being said, I fully support the nomination proposed by
> > WXW of DPF to the NC.
>You misunderstood, Jefsey. The nomination was as GA Representative to
>a Names Council working group, NOT to the Names Council. Only the
>constituency appointed people to the Names Council.
YOu right: this is what I mean. Several have asked about the way such a
representation would be carried: these are minor procedural points that
still may be discussed.
The main point is who will be selected. As I proposed, instead of one
talented and experience but alone person I propose 9 Members of the GA. You
may note that I continued considering that the NC working group would only
welcome one representative from the GA. In selecting 9 people from the
different geographical areas and cultures (what is a real need for
individual users) I think we would push the NC to delegate 9 people too to
that WG. We would then be sure to have a serious and documented final
document agreeing to the BoD.
But this is to the NC to decide.
>William X Walsh
>The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html