Re: [ga] Individuals' Constituency Task Force Member
I agree with both parts of the message quoted below..
> First I would think a call for nominations for the position would be in
> order and then a vote by the GA to select the member the assembly thinks
> would be best suited. If the GA is agreeable to the Chair specifying the
> appointment, I have no objection but will point out it may give reason for
> others in future to state a rejection of the choice.
> Second, Joop, as you mention has been predominate in the attempts to
> instigate an Individuals Constituency. He has made petition to the ICANN
> Board in his endevours. For reasons of their own, the Board has not
> looked favourably on the submissions made by Joop and it appears that he is
> not held in favour with that forum. This may cause his participation in
> the process to taint, in the Board's eyes, the outcomes. I say this not to
> belittle Joops achievements or to cast aspirations against him, but to
> highlight the fact he appears to have generated some disfavour in certain
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html