Re: [ga] Re: Restructuring ICANN

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

What is going on here?

This is from our election rules:


SELECTION OF THE ALTERNATE CHAIR

The same process as for chair is used, but the candidate selected for chair is
eliminated before the counting starts.

(NOTE: This is likely to be a different candidate than the runner-up in the
selection procedure for chair, for instance when 90% of the electorate rank one
person first and another second, while the remaining 10% vote for a third.
Re-running the process is considered more likely to select a team that can work
well together.)

Of course when I pointed this out after the election I was heavily chastised by
Corliss and crew as being a sore loser.  Now the bird has come home to roost.
This obvious behind the scenes pickering and fighting for power and control over
the lists is killing us.  It is becoming quite obvious that this alternate chair
has a different agenda than our chair.

Now review that I was suspended from this list because of pointing out this
horrendous conflict before either chair was formally elected. Of course the
suspension was voted for by Harald who drafted the above sited rule.

Most the time we do not need to restructure we just need to follow the existing
rules.

Sincerely,

Patrick Corliss wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:45:44 -0400, Danny Younger wrote:

> Subject: [ga-roots] RE: Restructuring ICANN
>
> > Patrick writes:  "It would be much appreciated if members would take up
> > any discussion relating to restructuring ICANN to the GA-ICANN mailing
> > list."
> >
> > On this occasion, I disagree with Patrick.  Knowing that structural issues
> > were to soon become a major topic of debate, it was decided to set up a
> > discussion list (GA-review) to continue the structural analysis first
> > started in the DNSO Review Working Group.
>
> Actually I am glad that you attacked me first.  That's twice now.
>
> I note that you have made another post to GA-REVIEW.  That makes nine
> postings to that list in six weeks.  Four of them were yours.  This can be
> compared with GA-ROOTS which has 704 postings to date.
>
> Please keep up the good work.  LOL.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html