RE: [ga] Re: Restructuring ICANN

["JIM FLEMING" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>]

ICANN is structured:
1/3 Protocol
1/3 Address
1/3 Names

Are you discussing Protocols, Addresses or Names ?

Jim Fleming
http://wwww.DOT-BIZ.com
0:212 BIZ World


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Eric Dierker
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Patrick Corliss
Cc: Danny Younger; [ga]
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Restructuring ICANN


What is going on here?

This is from our election rules:


SELECTION OF THE ALTERNATE CHAIR

The same process as for chair is used, but the candidate selected for chair
is
eliminated before the counting starts.

(NOTE: This is likely to be a different candidate than the runner-up in the
selection procedure for chair, for instance when 90% of the electorate rank
one
person first and another second, while the remaining 10% vote for a third.
Re-running the process is considered more likely to select a team that can
work
well together.)

Of course when I pointed this out after the election I was heavily chastised
by
Corliss and crew as being a sore loser.  Now the bird has come home to
roost.
This obvious behind the scenes pickering and fighting for power and control
over
the lists is killing us.  It is becoming quite obvious that this alternate
chair
has a different agenda than our chair.

Now review that I was suspended from this list because of pointing out this
horrendous conflict before either chair was formally elected. Of course the
suspension was voted for by Harald who drafted the above sited rule.

Most the time we do not need to restructure we just need to follow the
existing
rules.

Sincerely,

Patrick Corliss wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:45:44 -0400, Danny Younger wrote:

> Subject: [ga-roots] RE: Restructuring ICANN
>
> > Patrick writes:  "It would be much appreciated if members would take up
> > any discussion relating to restructuring ICANN to the GA-ICANN mailing
> > list."
> >
> > On this occasion, I disagree with Patrick.  Knowing that structural
issues
> > were to soon become a major topic of debate, it was decided to set up a
> > discussion list (GA-review) to continue the structural analysis first
> > started in the DNSO Review Working Group.
>
> Actually I am glad that you attacked me first.  That's twice now.
>
> I note that you have made another post to GA-REVIEW.  That makes nine
> postings to that list in six weeks.  Four of them were yours.  This can be
> compared with GA-ROOTS which has 704 postings to date.
>
> Please keep up the good work.  LOL.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html