ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Individual domain name holders and the DNSO


At 19:35 11/09/00 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
>At 08:58 PM 9/11/00 +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>>Mr Crocker' s sarcastic implication that we should have bowed and scraped
>>more, is... disturbing.
>
>
>If I had said anything remotely related to your assessment, I'd agree with 
>you.
>
>Perhaps you would care to cite text from me and explain how it means what 
>you above assert?
>
***********Here's your text
At 01:45 PM 9/11/00 +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>We deserve at least an answer stating why our petition has been stonewalled

such constructive presumptions and language have, no doubt, contributed 
greatly to IDNO's success.

d/
**********
Dave, 

Sarcasm , misunderstood as it can be, always gives you an opportunity to
backpedal.

You and Mr Crispin often make it sound as if you have an inside channel to
the Board. 
Since we are talking about the Board's (re)actions, my interpretation is a
logical one.

But enough of this. The burden to make clear what you meant is yours.




--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>