[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] *IF* ICANN fails what about UN?
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:16:18PM +0100, Mikael Pawlo wrote:
> > I think it would be wise to know what might happen if more and more
> > scholars leave the GA (for various reasons) and ICANN gains no support.
> The departure of scholars from the GA is completely orthogonal to
> support of ICANN. In fact, a good case could be made that scholars,
> with their idealistic search for perfection, are particularly pernicious
> in a body that must be oriented towards the practical. "Those who can,
> do; those who can't, become scholars". ICANN, to be successful, must
> *do* things. It can't be a testbed for dreams of theoretical
Yadi, yadi, yadi.
ICANN would be fine competetor in the cleaning houses-business if no one
considered the ways and directions ICANN should be working in and towards.
I thought the GA was more of a policy-thinking assembly than an executive
one, thus ICANN the executive force. (Yes I wrote that the scholars leave
the GA (not ICANN))
Anyway, I only got one serious response to my question so I guess things
are as they always were on this list. If anyone has more references on
the original matter than the Zittrain one I would still be interested in
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html