[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] *IF* ICANN fails what about UN?
At 22:46 23.02.00 +0100, Mikael Pawlo wrote:
>Yadi, yadi, yadi.
>ICANN would be fine competetor in the cleaning houses-business if no one
>considered the ways and directions ICANN should be working in and towards.
>I thought the GA was more of a policy-thinking assembly than an executive
>one, thus ICANN the executive force. (Yes I wrote that the scholars leave
>the GA (not ICANN))
Hmmm....I do not think of myself as a scholar, yet I think of myself as
being able to think about matters of policy. Should I feel slighted?
My personal feeling is that if ICANN fails, we'll have to go through the
whole exercise over again, and the end result is likely to have the same
faults as ICANN, since the external pressures that are the basis for these
faults (money power in a few hands, little coherence among the users, deep
distrust among both the users and the money powers towards governmental
solutions) remain much the same.
My personal reaction to this feeling is that I spend some of my time trying
to see if aspects of ICANN can be made to work better.
>Anyway, I only got one serious response to my question so I guess things
>are as they always were on this list.
Not quite - you didn't get flamed this time, I think.
There may still be hope.
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html