[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Result of the poll
Roberto and all,
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Joe Baptista wrote:
> >Always a pleasure - if not a joy. Now - when are we going to have a
> >vote - with real options?
> All what we need is agreement on the following:
> - clear definition of the voting body, with identification of the voting
Yes, but most of these you already know as they are participants
on the DNSO GA list or the DNSO Announce list. It might be a
good idea to open it up to those on the IETF, NONOCM, IDNO
and the Domain Policy lists as well.
> - clear definition of the voting procedure;
Indeed. And a clear adherence to that procedure as well.
One might also want a neutral third party to oversee this voting
such as the Federal Election Commission. HTTP://www.fec.gov
> - clear definition of the question upon which to vote.
Also agreed. If it is a resolution or resolutions, hopefully
this would be plural in all cases of Resolutions/Questions
that are being decided it should be by simple majority and
all votes should be tallied online with secret ballot.
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208