[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Re: Re: [ga] Proposal for mailing list policy
Joe Baptista wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>> This has already been clarified, so I don't need to go over it,
>> to tell you that I bet that the technique of trying to paralyze the
>> Canadian Government with a flood of faxes will be applied here, it's
>> just a matter of time and to find a good excuse.
>Your either a liar - and you certainly don't know my business well
>to comment on it. I will assume however that the language barrier
>you to be misinformed.
>Faxing the canadian government (in fact it was the Ontario) government
>nothing more then a regular communication session. back then I used
>government fax machines like email. these days i just send the whole
>of them email. Like my new "If you Don't Buy ICANN - Don't Buy
>IBM" campaign. I have selected over 80,000 civil servants for
>that. Email is much better then fax machines for those type of
>actions. They take it more personally - as you all do, and they
>more appropriately. it's like training seals with fish.
>> So, we can try the iper-liberal approach, but I am aware that, in
>> of a similar emergency, we must take a similar decision.
>> The iper-freedom for a few cannot be the denial of service to the
>that was not a denial of service attack.
Do you mind pointing out where in my message do you think I affirmed the
> After asking the DNSO-LIst admin
>repreatedly why I was not posting to the list, and getting no reply, I
>decided to test using everybody else email address. You can strick
>one on an absent admin, or an admin who is a coward. At the least, he
>failure to reply amounted to my test.
>I suggest you retract you accusation of denial of service attack, and I
>ask that you advise the Names Council to also retract that reference
>the official record. Because such accusations amount to liable and
>> Anybody else willing to comment?
>It's your turn now - as a member of the NC and our chair, you've just
>a faux paux. Let's see if you know how to retract.
Just for the record, I am not a member of the NC (as far as I know).
About the need to retract, if you care re-reading my post, once the
language barrier overcome ;>), you will see that I did not say that
there has been (yet) denial of service, but that, if such a risk will
arise on the GA, my attitude will be to not allow the denial of service,
even if this will mean some limitation of the individual posting