[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Re: [ga] Proposal for mailing list policy

On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, 7ways wrote:

> In my language barrier I can tell you that you are a stupid boy. During few

Well, as Einstein once said - stupidity like relativity is itself
relative.  Certainly many goverment officials would not agree with you ;-)
> weeks you cry around the world and I am tired to hear you. Please Joe if you
> stop I promess you to offer a drink during an ICANN meeting which will be a
> volontary contribution for the evolution process.

I decline participation - I don't drink.  But thanks anyway for the offer


> francois
> -----Original Message-----
> From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>
> To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>
> Cc: froomkin@law.miami.edu <froomkin@law.miami.edu>; karl@CaveBear.com
> <karl@CaveBear.com>; ga@dnso.org <ga@dnso.org>
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2000 3:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [ga] Proposal for mailing list policy
> >
> >
> >On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >
> >> This has already been clarified, so I don't need to go over it, except
> >> to tell you that I bet that the technique of trying to paralyze the
> >> Canadian Government with a flood of faxes will be applied here, it's
> >> just a matter of time and to find a good excuse.
> >
> >Your either a liar - and you certainly don't know my business well enough
> >to comment on it.  I will assume however that the language barrier caused
> >you to be misinformed.
> >
> >Faxing the canadian government (in fact it was the Ontario) government was
> >nothing more then a regular communication session.  back then I used
> >government fax machines like email.  these days i just send the whole lot
> >of them email.  Like my new "If you Don't Buy ICANN - Don't Buy
> >IBM" campaign.  I have selected over 80,000 civil servants for
> >that.  Email is much better then fax machines for those type of
> >actions.  They take it more personally - as you all do, and they respond
> >more appropriately.  it's like training seals with fish.
> >
> >> So, we can try the iper-liberal approach, but I am aware that, in case
> >> of a similar emergency, we must take a similar decision.
> >> The iper-freedom for a few cannot be the denial of service to the
> >> majority.
> >
> >that was not a denial of service attack.  After asking the DNSO-LIst admin
> >repreatedly why I was not posting to the list, and getting no reply, I
> >decided to test using everybody else email address.  You can strick that
> >one on an absent admin, or an admin who is a coward.  At the least, he
> >failure to reply amounted to my test.
> >
> >I suggest you retract you accusation of denial of service attack, and I
> >ask that you advise the Names Council to also retract that reference from
> >the official record.  Because such accusations amount to liable and
> >slander.
> >
> >> Anybody else willing to comment?
> >
> >It's your turn now - as a member of the NC and our chair, you've just made
> >a faux paux.  Let's see if you know how to retract.
> >
> >Regards
> >Joe Baptista
> >
> >