[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Majordomo 'who' command
>> I completely agree with Brett here. Although there are ways around
>> this disabling, it is not a "Best Practice" in which to operate the
>> Majordomo command functions. Should the DNSO List admin. Fail to
>> restore the 'Who' command, I may find it advantageous to reveal how it
>> can be circumvented to a number or "Interested Parties". I would
>> therefore suggest strongly that the Majordomo Commands, all of them be
>> restored, is a wise and prudent thing to do.
> This is as clear an example of disruptive and anti-social behavior as I
> have ever seen, outside of the so-called joe baptista. This kind of
> posting is exactly the reason that we need the rules that Harald
> proposed implemented ASAP.
I fail to see why. The only reason that I even saw Jeff's message is
because you reposted it. He was filtered out quite efficiently by my own
There are two ways to get rid of disruptive and non-contributory posters
You can either ban or censor them, or ignore them. If you ban/censor
All they want is a reaction. Banning or censoring them constitutes a
"reaction". If they get ignored, they will eventually leave.
My two cents. I feel that everyone has the right to speak. I also feel
that everyone should have the right to choose not to listen.