Re: [ga] silence in RROR v. PAB

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 12-Jan-2000 Mark C. Langston wrote:
> Once more, we're faced with the same old ICANN dilemma: Do we forsake
> correctness, depth and breadth of consideration, and solid procedure
> in order to buy haste?  Or should we, for once, sit down and actually
> put a structure in place before we take action?
> 
> I for one am sick of the former, and would welcome the latter.  This
> is something that should have been done when ICANN was formed, or even
> before; it certainly should have occurred before substantive decisions
> were made.  Now, the only choice we have is to correct that mistake
> now, or further delay dealing with it.  Mark my words, the time WILL
> come when it will have to be dealt with, and the longer we delay, the
> more difficult it becomes.

The problem, Mark, isn't from structure, but from a structure that gives more
ability to those who seek to disrupt to continue to do so, and tie this
assembly up in even more procedural wrangling.

I find your proposal sorely lacking because of this reason alone. 

- --
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: DSo Networks

iD8DBQE4e/qJ8zLmV94Pz+IRApMeAJ9aZsaA3zjwaUN/Js0J4hV9zlY0MwCfab0S
+nE1sQ/Kxp3vCp1S17oAAxo=
=ujgs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----