RE: [ga-rules] Sheriff or Marshall or Mentor

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-rules@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-rules@dnso.org]On Behalf
|> Of Eric Dierker
|> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:02 PM
|> To: [ga-rules]
|> Subject: [ga-rules] Sheriff or Marshall or Mentor
|>
|>
|> Too many have *voted to scrap the rules and monitors all together* so I
|> came up with a compromise with real beneficial promise.
|>
|> If you combine the following definitions and then use them with Joanna's
|> recent post regarding my suspension you come up with a great way to
|> monitor - MENTOR.  If a poster gets two complaints within ten days he
|> gets assigned a monitor mentor.  <snip>

Personally, I see no benefit in such a structure for the GA forum.  It is
not a mutual benefit society.  It is a working group.  If those
participating can not follow the rules of the working group they have
little to contribute.

In my opinion it would be much more rewarding to have a standard set of
rules that have clearly defined objective criteria in their application and
to do away with any subjective applications.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html