ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-rules]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-rules] Daily post limits


I am glad you brought up the do or die nature of Stockholm.  You could not possibly be
more wrong. I have to wonder where you came up with that opinion.  Stockholm is a show.
It is a movie imitating life, not the other way around.  What Judge is going to attend?
What Senator will be there? What DoC rep. will be there?
Even if a Board or Council takes a vote on something there is no immediate impact on any
of us. The important meetings are closed. It is like the gallery at a murder trial, they
have no impact on the verdict.

Since ICANN has allowed the various recent papers to be published and have signed off on
the important agreements prior to the meeting, The meeting is a sham.  That is why we are
boycotting.

Sincerely,

"William S. Lovell" wrote:

> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Ain't the word rule great. Law I understand, regulation I understand, custom I
> > understand but as you all know I have a real hard time with rules ;-}
> >
> > Mr. Walsh will you please chair this list?
> >
> > "William S. Lovell" wrote:
> >
> > > "William X. Walsh" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Bruce,
> > > >
> > > > Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 5:50:30 PM, Bruce James wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The *rules* are everyone has a daily limit of 5 posts per GA List. The Chair
> > > > > and Alt Chair have no limit to *Official* posts. They are the only ones that
> > > > > have a *free* pass...:)
> > > >
> > > > The issue is what constitutes an "official post."
> > >
> > > The issue is Stockholm.  Leave it off, huh?
> > >
> >
> > Mr. Lovell if you have something to say about Stockholm, let us hear but do not use
> > that as an excuse to stifle discussion. We would already have a set of motion rules
> > but Stockholm was an excuse to put it off, please check the tiny archives of this
> > list.
> >
>
> I shall indeed have things to say about Stockholm. Point is, if one has any concept of
> priorities, there has been time since the dawn of the cave man to resolve mail list
> rules,
> and I don't think that this window right now is the best time to tackle all the
> necessary
> resolution about list rules -- that could surely be put off until after Stockholm. We
> all
> may do or die because of Stockholm; I doubt we will over list rules.
>
> Bill Lovell

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>