DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-roots] Re: Criminalization of alt roots

Oh but you are clearly not a student of history.  There has never been a
people conquered or a successful revolution where the silent majority was not
more powerful than that of the speakers.  Those who won were the ones who
spoke for the majority without an explicit backing.  Sorry but France took no
consensus for their revolution, neither did the U.S. nor China nor Russia.  I
have proclaimed my representation of dotcommoners and no one opposes me, let
us see who stands behind me when I stage my revolution, if history repeats
itself it will be those of the silent majority who have not rejected my
repeated claims.

Wierd huh, and hard to swallow but true.


"William X. Walsh" wrote:

> Hello Eric,
> Thursday, May 03, 2001, 6:26:56 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
> > Mr. Walsh,
> > Show us any statistics to back up your claim.  I have found not one dot
> > commoner who opposes the existance of what you so disrespectfully and
> > ignorantly refer to as "alternatives".
> heh.  Lack of an explicit statement in opposition does not equate to
> support.
> Oh you really are rich.
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh

This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>