ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion


Ross,

In the document that is not "your draft", it is written:

"The Task Force suggests that, after further examination, that apparent 
authority is a well-defined legal concept and the lack of specific definition 
within the relevant body of ICANN policy should not be a barrier to the work 
of this task force to make policy recommendations."

Why continue to be obtuse?  Is there a particular reason why you will not 
provide a specific definition?  Further, what problems do you have with the 
Australian model as cited?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>