Re: [ga] Motion to Condemn the Propsed "theft" of the .BIZtldby ICANN

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 16:21 25/06/01, William S. Lovell said:
>I agree (with myself?) here, but disagree wholeheartedly that the sub-lists
>killed anything.  What is needed is focus, not a maelstrom as is the ga list

Bill,
again the sub-lists killed what we had worked out at the GA in taking one 
of the aspects totally out of context and in implementing it artificially.

I am really amazed by the capacity of the people to doctorally repeat the 
same discussions again and again over the years on the same mailing lists.

Danny wants probably as much as me - but may be not on the same agenda - to 
make that GA achieve something. Roberto made it to vote on they way it 
would vote. Danny pushed for something mixing a push with too many 
explanations. I gave up and enjoy the fun... You are trying to do something 
in a lawyer/pragmatic way... maybe will you suceed: good luck.

But the problem stays the same: with the international simplification of 
the words into their opposite they have decided that they wanted to "decide 
by consensus" wich is meaning while as consistent as "to run in spleeping" 
or "making the water to burn".

You may succeed in explaining Sotiris (I failed) what a consensus is or 
trade with him about a compromise deifinition (what would be absurd about a 
consensus), the next newby to come on the GA will restart the question 
again: "I want us to decide by consensus about the alt.roots (sic), where 
to we vote?".

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html