[ga] RE:Funding was Suspension of Voting Rights
|> -----Original Message-----
|> On Behalf Of Harald Tveit Alvestrand
|> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 6:24 PM
|> To: Roeland Meyer
|> Cc: email@example.com
|> Subject: RE: [ga] Suspension of Voting Rights
|> At 09:10 29.04.2001 -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
|> >In normal corporate activity, division funding comes from the top, not
|> >bottom. Also, only profit centers are expected to contribute revenue. I
|> >not aware that the DNSO has been designated a profit center. If it has,
|> >I have some serious reservations.
|> In normal corporate activity, cost centers that do not contribute
|> appropriate value to the effective function of the corporation are shut
|> down; benefit to the world outside the corporation is normally
|> not considered.
|> I do not think we want to encourage normal corporate procedures here.
I would tend to agree, the situation is much more complex than the simple
corporate procedures mentioned.
My own feeling is that the Constituencies should be self funded but they
should not be expected to fund the NC or general DNSO operations.
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html