<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] Complaint Against William X. Walsh
- To: "[ga-abuse]" <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
- Subject: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against William X. Walsh
- From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:50:12 +1100
- References: <20020129221842.78891.qmail@web14207.mail.yahoo.com><019801c1a917$be1f5170$17641aac@nipsco.com><17130622985.20020129151445@userfriendly.com><40171510268.20020129201215@inetconcepts.net><047b01c1aa79$b4393fa0$b33efea9@hamza><010101c1aa7a$38029570$040a000a@RRADER2K> <00d801c1aaca$bb3653a0$b33efea9@hamza> <451980828.20020131185848@userfriendly.com>
- Sender: owner-ga-abuse@dnso.org
Grounds: Offensive language
Rules of order for the mailing lists of the General Assembly of the DNSO
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules-v0.4.html
The following rules apply to content of messages on the GA list:
- Not indulging in personal attacks, insults or slander
- Not using offensive language
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:58:48 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
> Bullocks.
I consider the word "bullocks" as only lightly disguised instead of "bollocks"
a well-known pseudonym for a part of the male sexual physiology. The word is
deliberately and unnecessarily offensively.
Best regards
Patrick Corliss
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|