[ga-abuse] Complaint Against William X. Walsh

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Grounds:    Personal abuse directed at Chuck Gomes

> And you have the audacity to try and play it up

> Please, Chuck, any respect I had for you playing it straight is out
> the door.

> You, Sir, are out of line, and you owe this entire assembly an
> apology for your comments here.


Best regards
Patrick Corliss

----- Original Message -----
From: William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
To: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>
Cc: 'Ross Wm. Rader' <ross@tucows.com>; Registrars@Dnso. Org
<registrars@dnso.org>; <ga@dnso.org>; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org
<discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:28 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents


>
> Oh get off it.
>
> There were TWO posts about it.
>
> Here is exactly what they said:
>
> > Cute.  Both the Revised Proposal and the Justification Document
> > require a User ID and Password.
>
> and:
> > What is the user-name and what is the password?
>
> And you have the audacity to try and play it up like there were so
> many Anti-Verisign comments over it.
>
> Please, Chuck, any respect I had for you playing it straight is out
> the door.
>
> You turn two comments, one simply asking for the login data to get to
> the documents, and the other simply saying that they required a
> password, into some big Anti-Verisign attack and backlash.
>
> You, Sir, are out of line, and you owe this entire assembly an
> apology for your comments here.
>
>
> Tuesday, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 11:18:08 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > Ross,
>
> > What you thought you realized, that the documents were "only made
> > available via the password protected VGRS Registrar Support site," was
> > in fact WRONG. Moreover, it was extremely inappropriate to cross-post a
> > message sent to VeriSign's registrars list to another list.  Nor do I
> > simply want to fault Ross because, as other posts have illustrated,
> > others jumped to the same false conclusions.
>
> > For all of the conspiracy theorists on this list as well as those who
> > cannot see past their anti-VeriSign emotions please note the following:
> > 1) the two documents were sent by me to the GA list at 11:49 am EST; 2)
> > the two documents were sent to the VGRS registrars list at 12:08 pm; 3)
> > some simple arithmetic indicates that the documents were sent to the GA
> > list prior to being sent to the private VGRS registrars list.
>
> > I tolerate a lot of garbage on this list, but the posts on this subject
> > during the last couple hours have gone beyond my willingness to ignore.
> > They provide prime evidence why the GA is often ignored.  And that is
> > very unfortunate for the many members of the list who work hard to make
> > it a constructive source of input regarding DNSO issues.
>
> > Chuck
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:38 PM
> >> To: Ross Wm. Rader; Registrars@Dnso. Org; ga@dnso.org;
> >> Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org
> >> Subject: Re: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
> >>
> >>
> >> I hadn't realized that this was only made available via the password
> >> protected VGRS Registrar Support site. I have made them available at
> >> http://www.byte.org/rc-deletes without a password if you wish
> >> to view them
> >> in MS-Word format.
> >>
> >> -rwr
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
> >> To: "Registrars@Dnso. Org" <registrars@dnso.org>; <ga@dnso.org>;
> >> "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org" <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:01 PM
> >> Subject: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "VeriSign Global Registry Services" <info@verisign-grs.com>
> >> > To: <registrars@verisign-grs.com>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:36 AM
> >> > Subject: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > To All Registrars:
> >> >
> >> > Two documents related to the wait listing service (WLS)
> >> have been posted
> >> to
> >> > our web site:
> >> >
> >> > 1. Revised WLS proposal based on feedback received from
> >> registrars and
> >> other
> >> > interested and parties
> >> > 2. Justification for a Registry-based Wait Listing Service document
> >> >
> >> > These documents are located at:
> >> > http://www.verisign-grs.com/support/waitListService.pdf (Revised WLS
> >> > document)
> >> > http://www.verisign-grs.com/support/WLS_Justification.pdf
> >> (Justification
> >> > document)
> >> >
> >> > Please note the recommended procedures and deadlines for
> >> questions and
> >> > feedback that are contained toward the beginning of the
> >> revised proposal.
> >> > Feedback for these documents should be directed to wls@verisign.com.
> >> >
> >> > VeriSign GRS will be distributing these documents to other
> >> constituencies
> >> as
> >> > well and encouraging responses from all interested parties.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Chris Sheridan
> >> > Manager, Customer Service
> >> > VeriSign Global Registry Services
> >> > www.verisign-grs.com
> >> > info@verisign-grs.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
>
> "There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of
> the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer
> interprets the truth."
> -- Jean Giradoux
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>