DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] 2001. 1. 15 Report , Part I

Thanks Greg,
The voting tally will certainly do much to establish the level of
credibility of this report.  Given the tight timeframe within which we all
must work, when do you expect to have the results?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
Cc: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>; <nc-review@dnso.org>; "Greg Burton"
<sidna@feedwriter.com>; "vint cerf" <vcerf@MCI.NET>; <Amadeu@nominalia.com>;
<ivanmc@akwan.com>; <phil.davidson@bt.com>; <f.fitzsimmons@att.net>;
<ken.fockler@sympatico.ca>; <mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com>; <hans@icann.org>; "S.
H. Kyong" <shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr>; <andy@ccc.de>; <junsec@wide.ad.jp>;
<quaynor@ghana.com>; <roberts@icann.org>; <helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de>;
<linda@icann.org>; <council@dnso.org>; "Alejandro Pisanty, CUAED + FQ, UNAM"
<apisan@servidor.unam.mx>; "Karl Auerbach" <karl@CAVEBEAR.COM>; "Jonathan
Cohen" <jcohen@shapirocohen.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [council] 2001. 1. 15 Report , Part I

> At 09:05 PM 1/16/01, Erica Roberts wrote:
> >Thank you YJ. To the best of my knowledge, this report has not been
> >by your group and so its credibility may come under question.   It would
> >helpful if you could include:
> >* information on any votes taken;
> >* any other information which will indicate the level of support this
> >has from your group;
> >*  information on the size, level of participation, and composition of
> >group;
> >* information on who has produced and signed off on this report.
> Hello, Erica and all
> If I may interject a comment, votes will be proceeding on every element of
> the final report, except for personal statements of position. For each
> section, the actual tally of votes will be included.
> Regards,
> Greg
> WG-Review co-chair
> Regards,
> Greg
> sidna@feedwriter.com

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>