DNSO Archives: [council]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: ICCAN AT-LARGE PROCESS (URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED)

To: apisan@servidor.unam.mx (Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ)
Subject: Re: [council] RE: ICCAN AT-LARGE PROCESS (URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED)
From: ppoblete@nic.cl (Patricio Poblete)
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 10:53:40 -0400 (CST)
Cc: mclaughlin@pobox.com (Andrew McLaughlin), ppoblete@nic.cl (Patricio Poblete), council@dnso.org, icann-board@icann.org (ICANN Board of Directors)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10009092202130.23387-100000@servidor.unam.mx> from "Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ" at Sep 09, 2000 10:07:52 PM
Sender: owner-council@dnso.org

Dear Alex, Andrew and all,

Let me say that I am well aware of how hard it is to try to filter
the applications to weed out fake identities. I am sure the staff are
doing a great job in this respect, but mistakes are bound to happen,
and I hope they can be fixed in time, if at all possible.

By the way, I have been unable to find a rule forbidding email account
sharing among members.

Patricio Poblete

References:
- RE: [council] RE: ICCAN AT-LARGE PROCESS (URGENT RESPONSE REQUESTED)
  - From: Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>