Re: [council] Methodology

[Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>]

At 02:02 PM 27/09/1999 +0200, Javier wrote:
>We have been working on the elections issue for a while. I have been 
>presenting proposals with a lot of time before the calls. Few comments have 
>been received....

ok. Is not my case. I have been tryed to participate.


>
>but some members of the council feel free to make proposals during the 
>teleconferneces, and expect to have them discussed on the spot. I find this 
>extremelly unpolite, it is a waste of time and money for the council to 
>have to discuss online things that should be discussed by e-mail.

1) Great!. I support it.


>
>If they do not have the time to propose things by e-mail (as we have agreed 
>to), they should at least stay quiet during the teleconferences.


2) Great again !

>
>Also, those who do not attend the meetings should at least respect the 
>decisions of the other people who have actually attended the meeting and 
>done the work. Complaining afterwards is of very bad taste. It is much 
>worst if you actually attended the meeting and did not say anything at that 
>time.

3) I see your point but I beg to differ with you in one point. This could
be applyed *ONLY* if we work considering points 1 and 2 (see above).


>
>The decision on the election process was supposed to be finished by the 
>24th. Any further delay is impossible.
>
>In short, if you are not participating in the work for which you have been 
>elected, at least allow the rest of us to do it.
>

Who are you speaking about ?. Because the complaints are from people who
are participating in the Name Council (i.e Nigel and I) , or not?. There
are some of us that don't express their opinions. Tell them.



Raul Echeberria
raul@inia.org.uy