Re: Legal Question - Re: [wg-review] Concerns
I have monitored the ICANN work groups. The problem I am having with your
answer is that I cannot find that ICANN work groups have influenced ICANN to
modify its policy and process for the good of the DNS. It appears that only
ICANN representatives have chosen the agendas with a flagrant disregard toward
any fair consensus process and work group process.
Has ICANN or its representatives made any statement regarding that it is
looking to modify its policy and process for the good of the DNS?
Has ICANN or its representatives made any statement regarding that ICANN is
looking to include international Internet constituency representatives to play
key roles in the control and management and integrity of the DNS?
Why are the above-mentioned questions not being addressed?
It appeared to me yesterday that during the teleconference ICANN
representatives demanded that their agendas move forward, regardless of the
lack of support for the agendas.
Is your interpretation of support for ICANN agendas the participation of 4 or
5 people to represent the World on major issues affecting the future of the
I believe that this working group should help ICANN identify problems with its
self-serving policy. ICANN has its global dictatorship position today, while
it strives to proliferate its bad policy and unfair consensus process, because
very few understood or was willing to challenge these matters until now.
ICANN should realize that its old way of doing things by the "consensus
process" will no longer work to control the World, especially in the current
state of the US economy.
Greg Burton wrote:
> At 01:23 PM 1/25/01, Derek Conant wrote:
> >Can you then please explain or outline for me the progress you have seen
> >the work groups and where the work groups actually influenced ICANN to
> >modify its
> >policy and process for the good of the DNS?
> My position is that we're doing it right here, right now - if we can focus
> on tasks.
> This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html