Re: Legal Question - Re: [wg-review] Concerns
At 12:50 PM 1/25/01, Derek Conant wrote:
>In a previous email you indicated that one of your frustrations is creating a
>work plan, posting it for comment and having it ignored by the work group and
>ICANN. This is the very same point I have been raising! This is obviously
>the only way ICANN operates.
Um, no, it isn't. I was referring to participants ignoring it, not ICANN.
The NC hasn't ignored it at all.
>Without any real support or work group representation, it appeared to me that
>only agendas submitted by ICANN representatives themselves were pushed
>forward. No other ideas or comments were acknowledged by the ICANN
That's not my impression at all, but I would urge people to listen to the
mp3 files of the teleconference that Bret Fausett has kindly and generously
provided at http://www.lextext.com/nc0124.html and make that decision for
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html